Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

The Treaty

The U.S. Is “Chipping Away” at Russian influence in Central Asia

President Putin of Russia in 2018.
President Putin of Russia in 2018.

Key Points and Summary – The U.S. held a “C5+1” summit with five Central Asian leaders, a “pragmatic play” to exploit Russia’s distraction with the Ukraine war.

-The “main interest” was securing access to the region’s “coveted supplies” of uranium and rare earths to reduce U.S. dependence on Russia.

-The summit resulted in new agreements for Boeing aircraft sales, mineral mapping projects, and, significantly, U.S. financing for the “Middle Corridor”—a trade route that bypasses Russia and further isolates Moscow.

Washington Wants Central Asian Minerals Out of Russia’s Grasp

The White House’s meeting this week with the leaders of Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Turkmenistan was presented by US officials as a pragmatic play, aided by Russia’s focus on the war in Ukraine.

The C5+1 summit, marking its tenth anniversary in 2025, has taken on new significance since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

The platform is now perceived as one pathway toward chipping away at Moscow’s influence in Central Asia and to limit China’s growing leverage in the region.

“There is an opportunity here because Russia is focused elsewhere,” Senator Steve Daines (R-MT) said. “Ukraine has changed the strategic environment.”

The U.S.’s main interest at the summit was obvious: access to critical minerals. Central Asia has plentiful coveted supplies of uranium and rare earths. These resources are crucial to modern weapons production, nuclear power, and electronics.

Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan currently supply a major chunk of global uranium, including for US nuclear plants. Despite other existing sanctions, the United States continues to import hundreds of tonnes of its uranium from Russia, although this is a major drop compared to their pre-2022 trade.

That dependence has become politically uncomfortable during a war in which Washington is supplying Ukraine to resist Moscow.

The summit saw a slew of new agreements, including U.S. promises to sell Boeing aircraft to Kazakh, Uzbek, and Tajik airlines, fresh financing for the so-called “Middle Corridor” trade route that would bypass Russia and the Suez Canal, while linking Europe and Central Asia. The states also agreed to better cooperate on lucrative mineral mapping projects.

Expanding the Middle Corridor matters for Ukraine. The more trade routes that avoid Russian territory, the less control Moscow has over vital regional transport and export flows.

None of the Central Asian governments is anywhere near willing to break with Moscow, on whom they rely as a critical trading partner. Up to 10.5 million Central Asians are thought to be resident in Russia on work visas. Neighboring China is also a growing influence in the region, sometimes competing with Russia over regional mining and infrastructure projects.

Still, as with most nations, Central Asian leaders are more than happy to consider more autonomy for themselves.

Kazakhstan’s decision to join the Abraham Accords, an initiative intended to thaw relations between Israel and the Muslim world, was a curious example of this fledgling spirit. While the shift is largely symbolic, given that Kazakhstan has had relations with Israel since the early 1990s, it still reflects a foreign policy move toward a U.S. ally, outside Moscow’s orbit.

For Kyiv, the outcome is indirect but highly relevant. If Russia is forced to spend more time and political capital maintaining influence in Central Asia, it may have less power to pressure Ukraine’s neighbors or redirect military and economic focus to the war.

The U.S. goal is not to replace Russia in Central Asia overnight, but to narrow Moscow’s room to act while the war grinds on.

About the Author: Georgia Gilholy

Georgia Gilholy is a journalist based in the United Kingdom who has been published in Newsweek, The Times of Israel, and the Spectator. Gilholy writes about international politics, culture, and education. You can follow her on X: @llggeorgia.

More Military

A ‘Small War’ Against Venezuela Is a Really Big Mistake

The Air Force’s Mach 2 F-15C/D Fighter Isn’t Going Anywhere

The United Kingdom Has a Message for the F-35 Stealth Fighter

How China’s Navy Scammed Its Way Into Aircraft Carriers

The F-14 Super Tomcat 21 Fighter Had Just One Mission

Georgia Gilholy
Written By

Georgia Gilholy is a journalist based in the United Kingdom who has been published in Newsweek, The Times of Israel, and the Spectator. Gilholy writes about international politics, culture, and education. Follow her on X: @llggeorgia.

3 Comments

3 Comments

  1. Jim

    November 7, 2025 at 6:08 pm

    It’s fortunate for the United States the Central Asian countries are open to vector diplomacy.

    “Vector” in this context means whatever direction the best deal comes from is where and who these countries will do business with. An open attitude looking for whoever provides the best deal.

    To have successful economic & political relations with this cluster of nation-states with their potentially significant natural resources, the United States has to do two things: its interests and representatives have to make competitive offers to engage in economic projects which are better than other bidders. And it can’t “clamp down” and say, “You’re either with us or against us.” This has been what has happened too many times before.

    Much of the World is tired of one-sided, unequal business deals with the United States and the seemingly resultant political control. It ends up being self defeating and causing resentment, not improved diplomatic relations as should flow from such business opportunities.

    Countries want to accept the best deal in terms of a win-win scenario between outside investors and host countries’ domestic businesses and the host country’s government.

    If the United States wants a piece of the action in Central Asia then a best deal attitude has to be the prevailing mindset and policy.

    Not the Full-Spectrum Dominance stratagems of the past.

  2. Dr. Hujjathullah M.H.B. Sahib

    November 10, 2025 at 10:21 am

    Couldn’t agree more with Jim here. He is right to advocate for greater pragmatism in U.S. foreign policy on Central Asia. Central Asian leaders are naturally predisposed to securing better relations with the U.S. but not at the expense of their relations with either Russia or China. Trump’s ironic prioritizing of ties with Israel even under his allegedly “America First” slogan actually is redundant in the Central Asian region where illegitimate Israel has long been accorded diplomatic legitimacy. Thus Trump if he is coherent in his outlook should seize this favourable occidentation available across Central Asia.

  3. Swamplaw Yankee

    November 10, 2025 at 2:10 pm

    Did not the MAGA POTUS just self abdicate as Leader of the WEST? Where is reference to Xi? -30-

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Military Hardware: Tanks, Bombers, Submarines and More

Key Points and Summary – NASA’s X-43A Hyper-X program was a tiny experimental aircraft built to answer a huge question: could scramjets really work...

Military Hardware: Tanks, Bombers, Submarines and More

Key Points and Summary – China’s J-20 “Mighty Dragon” stealth fighter has received a major upgrade that reportedly triples its radar’s detection range. -This...

Military Hardware: Tanks, Bombers, Submarines and More

Article Summary – The Kirov-class was born to hunt NATO carriers and shield Soviet submarines, using nuclear power, long-range missiles, and deep air-defense magazines...

Military Hardware: Tanks, Bombers, Submarines and More

Key Points and Summary – While China’s J-20, known as the “Mighty Dragon,” is its premier 5th-generation stealth fighter, a new analysis argues that...