Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

The Treaty

Israel-Iran War is a Double-Edged Sword for Putin’s Russia

Iron Dome from Israel
Iron Dome from Israel. Image Credit: Creative Commons.

Key Points – Russia is attempting to navigate the Israel-Iran war from a position of limited influence, urging de-escalation while quietly seeing some strategic benefits.

-The conflict has raised oil prices, a boon for Russia’s economy, and has successfully diverted Western attention and resources, like US anti-drone missiles, away from Ukraine.

-Despite this, Moscow fears a wider regional war, the potential for regime change in Tehran which could undermine its interests, and the destabilizing effect of a nuclear-armed Iran.

-With little leverage to shape events, President Putin has offered to mediate, but for now, Russia remains largely a bystander to the escalating conflict.

What Does Putin Really Want in the Israel-Iran Conflict?

As President Donald Trump weighs whether to join Israel’s military operation against Iran, Russia hopes to broker a diplomatic off-ramp. While the conflict presents some opportunities for Russia, it also carries serious risks. But Moscow finds itself with few good options to shape US and Israeli decision-making.

In public statements and international fora, Russian diplomats have urged de-escalation, condemning the Israeli strikes and blaming the West for allegedly helping provoke the crisis (though they’ve carefully avoided critiquing Trump). This action was the bare minimum Tehran expected from Moscow.

Russian President Vladimir Putin, however, has ruled out military intervention. Covert arms supplies also appear unlikely and probably wouldn’t make much difference anyhow, at least in the immediate future. Compared to Russia’s Foreign Ministry, Putin has been more muted in his criticism of Israel.

He even chided Tehran for allegedly rejecting a previous Russian offer to help build out Iran’s air defenses.

Relations Between Russia and Iran

Despite recently signing a strategic partnership agreement, Russia and Iran have eschewed a commitment to mutual defense. Their relations have certainly deepened in recent years, but Russia has never gone “all in” on Iran, seeking to maintain ties with the Arab Gulf states and Israel. Russia’s “multi-vector” approach to the Middle East is part of the reason Moscow has declined or delayed certain arms transfers to Iran and its proxies over the years. On June 13, Putin phoned both the Iranian and Israeli leaders, offering to mediate talks toward a resolution ensuring both Iran’s right to civilian nuclear energy and Israel’s “unconditional security.”

Meanwhile, Russian experts and elites have confessed admiration—and more than a little envy—at the ruthless competence with which Israel decimated Iran’s military leadership and capabilities. To many in Moscow, the Israeli operation demonstrates the immutable reality that “might makes right,” as RT editor-in-chief Margarita Simonyan put it.

Might Makes Right

Although the Kremlin has urged de-escalation, the conflict isn’t without benefits for Russia. It has buoyed oil prices—good news for Russia’s struggling economy and federal budget if the higher prices last. Russian market analysts predict that the increase will be temporary, although this could change as events on the ground unfold. If the crisis leads to increased Chinese demand for Russian energy, it could grant Moscow a touch more leverage in a relationship increasingly dominated by Beijing.

Furthermore, Moscow no doubt hopes the conflict will exacerbate transatlantic frictions and distract Western attention and resources from the war in Ukraine, Russia’s top priority. Earlier this week, the conflict prompted Trump to depart early from a G7 summit where his Ukrainian counterpart had hoped to push the American president for tougher sanctions on Russia. Even before Israel launched its operation, the Pentagon diverted to the Middle East fuzes for counter-drone rockets that had been intended for Ukraine. Kyiv’s supply of Patriot surface-to-air missiles, already insufficient, may get stretched even thinner.

Russia’s own war effort likely won’t suffer significantly. Moscow no longer depends on Tehran for supplies of the Shahed-136 drones it uses to bombard Ukraine, as Russia itself now produces modified versions of those drones—and in far greater numbers. Russia has received some artillery ammunition from Iran but in relatively small quantities. Tehran may now be unable or unwilling to send Moscow more close-range ballistic missiles. However, those it has provided haven’t even seen action—possibly because Iran hasn’t delivered the launchers. By contrast, Russian experts predict Iran will emerge from the conflict more desperate for Russian arms.

Finally, the Kremlin hopes that by playing the role of peace broker, it can bolster Russian influence both with Trump and in the region. In recent months, Moscow has repeatedly pointed to Iran as an area for potential cooperation with Washington—part of an effort to de-link US-Russia relations from Ukraine. After the Israeli strikes began, Putin wasted little time in calling Trump to offer help in mediating.

Yet Trump has sent mixed signals about his openness to Russian mediation, while Moscow acknowledges that Israel currently has no interest in talking. Russia has few good cards it can play to change that calculus. Even whether Iran, traditionally suspicious of Russian intentions, would accept Russian mediation isn’t a given.

Indeed, Russia has been largely relegated to a bystander to the Middle East war—even as the risks to its interests are growing.

As Israel has widened the scope of its strikes, the Kremlin has expressed alarm at hints that Jerusalem and Washington will seek regime change. Moscow understands that its replacement could be far less favorable, undermining Russia’s regional influence as well as economic projects such as the International North-South Transport Corridor. This would only add to the blow dealt by the fall of Russia’s Syrian client Bashar al-Assad last December.

The Russians also worry that the “galloping escalation” between Iran, Israel, and potentially the United States could wind up destabilizing the broader region. Moscow fears that this instability could spill over into Russia’s neighbors in the Caucasus and Central Asia and potentially into Russia itself.

Moreover, Moscow is skeptical that Israel alone can destroy Iran’s nuclear program. Russian experts worry the conflict could lead Tehran to develop a nuclear weapon or at least a dirty bomb. Russia does not want to see a nuclear-armed Iran. However, it would also not welcome further unilateral US military intervention in the Middle East.

Russia fancies itself as deserving a seat at the table on matters of global import. The time may yet come when Russia can insert itself diplomatically to help broker an agreement. But with little leverage to shape events on the ground, Moscow, for now, can only watch and wait.

About the Author: John Hardie

John Hardie serves as deputy director of FDD’s Russia Program. His research focuses on Russian foreign and security policy, US policy toward Russia and the post-Soviet space, and transatlantic relations. His byline has appeared in publications including Foreign Policy, Defense News, The National Interest, and C4ISRNET. John holds an M.A. in security studies from the Georgetown University School of Foreign Service and bachelor’s degrees in international relations, political science, and psychology from the University of Georgia.

Iran War

30,000 Pound Bunker-Buster Bombs Might Not Be Able to Destroy Fordow 

Iran Has Hypersonic Missiles 

Iran Still Flies the F-14 Tomcat 

John Hardie
Written By

John Hardie serves as deputy director of FDD’s Russia Program. His research focuses on Russian foreign and security policy, US policy toward Russia and the post-Soviet space, and transatlantic relations. His byline has appeared in publications including Foreign Policy, Defense News, The National Interest, and C4ISRNET. John holds an M.A. in security studies from the Georgetown University School of Foreign Service and bachelor’s degrees in international relations, political science, and psychology from the University of Georgia.

5 Comments

5 Comments

  1. doyle

    June 20, 2025 at 7:15 pm

    Putin absolutely has no room to maneuver in the 2025 iran-israel war and it is better for him to fully concentrate on defeating the nazis in Donbass. And they’re still very, very extremely strong, as of today, June 20 2025.

    The only nation that can influence this bloody murderous one-sided war, in any manner, is china, but xi jinping is well known for throwing friends and allies under the bus, as long as his country’s trade prospects are solidly & positively guaranteed by his treachery.

    Xi doesn’t realize the ongoing bloody kill-killing war is being silently orchestrated by the US-EU conglomerate, whose next target is the western Pacific region, no less.

    Once Iran falls, Russia is very likely to follow suit, AND the path to the western Pacific becomes fully open.

    So now, Putin must win against the nazist foot soldiers of the US-EU nexus, using nukes if necessary, and at the same time hope that the Chinese masses are able to rise up and hurl the treacherous xi away from power and exile him abroad.

    Otherwise, it’s game over for Russia and the western Pacific.

    Hasta la Vista.

  2. Doyle-2

    June 21, 2025 at 9:23 am

    The furiously raging and wildly ongoing strikes unleashed in the middle east conflict are far more intense than those seen in the conflict in donbass.

    In fact, they are a cinematic trailer or cinematic preview of What’s going to take place in the western pacific just a few years from now.

    But the scale of the coming conflict in the western pacific would very easily be tens of times greater.

    The idea of the offensive side (striking force) is to turn his foe into a large-sized parking lot. Reasons given for initiating the offensive are just nothing more than agitprop PR. Or hogwash PR.

    The fate of iran is likely to follow or become similar to the fate that befell iraq after US state secretary colin powell presented his iraq yellowcake dossier to the UNSC on feb 5 2003.

  3. waco

    June 21, 2025 at 12:16 pm

    World war three is now looking more and more to be totally inevitable as netayahu goes for broke and presses with his mad aim to slaughter iran.

    That will soon precipitate the use of nukes by somebody because they can no longer bear to witness the continuing carnage. It’s beyond belief.

    One path to the use of nukes now, in 2025, is using them against netanyahu’s junior brother, herr zelenskyy.

    Another path is a lightning fast punch to the city of Taipei, and in the process, forcing (compelling) netanyahu’s patron to fight and collide with xi jinping, the paramount and completely corrupt leader.

    Netanyahu’s brother & netanyahu’s patron. The keys.
    Remember both of them.

  4. Taco

    June 21, 2025 at 5:17 pm

    In the fall of 2002, allegations of top secret documents showing Iraqi purchase of uranium ore from niger began circulating in washington.

    In february 2003, colin powell presented the documents at the UNSC to justify US military plan to wage war to stop iraq’s WMD program and garner support for it.

    After US army finished invading iraq, no uranium ore was ever found.

    Now, today, that dark patch of history is being repeated. By donny trump and the apple of his eye, mini-aloizovich benjamin netanyahu.

    So, when will that drama get rehashed for the third time.

    After 2028.In western pacific.

  5. D-O-Y-L-E

    June 21, 2025 at 9:47 pm

    (D-O-Y-L-E = Does orange yellah love extinction-level-event.)

    News have just come US liar-in-chief Orange Yellah has bombed three nuclear sites in iran, esfahan, natanz and fordow.

    That is pure textbook adolf hitler style military aggression, and so all countries MUST rise up now, boycott all american goods and BAN export of all precious rare earths products to US.

    Down with orange yellah hitler and his cohort. Ww3 coming…!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Military Hardware: Tanks, Bombers, Submarines and More

Key Points and Summary – NASA’s X-43A Hyper-X program was a tiny experimental aircraft built to answer a huge question: could scramjets really work...

Military Hardware: Tanks, Bombers, Submarines and More

Key Points and Summary – China’s J-20 “Mighty Dragon” stealth fighter has received a major upgrade that reportedly triples its radar’s detection range. -This...

Military Hardware: Tanks, Bombers, Submarines and More

Article Summary – The Kirov-class was born to hunt NATO carriers and shield Soviet submarines, using nuclear power, long-range missiles, and deep air-defense magazines...

Military Hardware: Tanks, Bombers, Submarines and More

Key Points and Summary – While China’s J-20, known as the “Mighty Dragon,” is its premier 5th-generation stealth fighter, a new analysis argues that...